In most cases, a wh-question calls for an answer that names an entity in the set denoted by the extension of the wh-complement. However, evidence from questions with necessity modals and questions with collective predicates shows that sometimes a wh-question must be interpreted with a higher-order reading, in which this question calls for an answer that names a generalized quantifier.
This paper investigates the distribution and the compositional derivation of these higher-order readings. First, I argue that the generalized quantifiers that can serve as semantic answers to wh-questions must be homogeneously positive. Next, on the distribution of higher-order readings, I find that questions in which the wh-complement is singular-marked or numeral-modified can be responded by elided disjunctions but not conjunctions. I further present two ways to account for this disjunction--conjunction asymmetry. In the uniform account, these questions admit disjunctions because disjunctions (but not conjunctions) may satisfy the atomicity requirement of singular-marking and the cardinality requirement of numeral-modification. In the reconstruction-based account, the wh-complement is syntactically reconstructed, which gives rise to local uniqueness and yields a contradiction for conjunctive answers.
Format: | [ pdf ] |
Reference: | lingbuzz/004859 (please use that when you cite this article) |
Published in: | Natural Language Semantics DOI: 10.1007/s11050-020-09166-8 |
keywords: | wh-words, questions, higher-order readings, quantifiers, boolean coordinations, number marking, uniqueness, collectivity, reconstruction, semantics |
previous versions: | v10 [May 2020] v9 [May 2020] v8 [May 2020] v7 [May 2020] v6 [April 2020] v5 [April 2020] v4 [January 2020] v3 [December 2019] v2 [December 2019] v1 [October 2019] |
Downloaded: | 3136 times |