Phonological asymmetries between roots and affixes
Maria Gouskova
July 2021 

This review surveys the phonological asymmetries between roots and non-roots (affixes, clitics). It starts with an extraphonological, structural definition of roots, and considers those non-phonological properties that are phonologically relevant: they are easily borrowed, and they are most deeply embedded. The empirical portion of the review concentrates on templaticism and size restrictions, asymmetries in segmental contrast/inventories, the properties of multi-root words (compounds), and accentual characteristics that differ between roots and affixes. The theoretical section surveys theories that account for these properties: Prosodic Morphology, Positional Faithfulness, the cycle and its analogs, and Anti-Faithfulness. I then critically review several recent and not-so-recent proposals that blur the line between affixes and roots, using the ’root’ designation diacritically or recasting diacritic distinctions as structural distinctions. The concluding section discusses the role of roots in phonological learnability.

Format:	[ pdf ]
Reference:	lingbuzz/005713 (please use that when you cite this article)
Published in:	to appear, Wiley Blackwell Companion to Morphology. Edited by Peter Ackema, Sabrina Bendjaballah, Eulàlia Bonet, and Antonio Fábregas.
keywords:	morphology, phonology, roots, affixes, clitics, compounds, segmental inventories, lexical accent, templaticism, size, quechua, fijian, navajo, russian, turkish, lakhota, xhosa, kipsigis, positional faithfulness, antifaithfulness, prosodic morphology, cyclicity, reduplication, learnability, morphology, phonology
previous versions:	v2 [July 2021] v1 [January 2021]
Downloaded:	630 times

 

[ edit this article | back to article list ]