CSC-Violating Head Movement in English Conditional Inversion
Enrico Flor, Stanislao Zompi'
March 2021 

The ban on asymmetric extraction from coordinate structures, commonly known as Coordinate Structure Constraint, is crosslinguistically very robust and has found very few counterexamples in English (Postal 1998 and references therein). We document a new challenge to the general validity of CSC, represented by sentences like:

(1) Ann would not have proposed, had Rita ignored her calls and had forgotten her birthday.

(2) Should we support Ann and she were to win, she would allow us to drive her Ferrari.

We call the construction exemplified by the antecedents of (1) and (2) Asymmetric Conditional Inversion (ACI). Assuming that Conditional Inversion involves T-to-C Head Movement (Pesetsky 1989, Iatridou & Embick 1994), we use interpretive evidence to argue that the only viable analysis of ACI sentences is one in which the Auxiliary is T-to-C extracted out of the first conjunct in violation of the CSC, as it is normally stated.

Format:	[ pdf ]
Reference:	lingbuzz/005853 (please use that when you cite this article)
Published in:	Submitted
keywords:	conditional inversion, coordinate structure constraint, head movement, syntax
previous versions:	v1 [March 2021]
Downloaded:	1146 times

 

[ edit this article | back to article list ]