Simplex reflexives in Dutch
Hans Broekhuis
March 2022 

The distribution of Dutch simplex reflexives like 'zich' has long been considered a problem for canonical binding theory and has motivated various extensions and revisions of it. This article argues that the standard binding theory is essentially correct, because the distribution of simplex reflexives has nothing to do with binding at all but involves inalienable possession, as proposed in Postma (1997) and Rooryck & Vanden Wyngaerd (2011): Dutch simplex reflexives are not bound but inalienably possessed by their antecedent. So far, this proposal has been elaborated mainly for inherently reflexive constructions, but we will show that it can also explain the distribution of the Dutch simplex reflexives in non-inherently reflexive constructions if we adopt the analysis of inalienable possession constructions in Broekhuis & Cornips (1997).

Format:	[ pdf ]
Reference:	lingbuzz/005929 (please use that when you cite this article)
Published in:	Glossa 7/1 (https://doi.org/10.16995/glossa.5821)
keywords:	binding theory, simplex reflexive, inalienable possession, inherent reflexivity, small clauses, aci-constructions, syntax
previous versions:	v3 [January 2022] v2 [November 2021] v1 [May 2021]
Downloaded:	1362 times

 

[ edit this article | back to article list ]