Pronouns as Demonstratives
Kyle Blumberg
September 2021

In this paper, I outline a novel approach to the semantics of natural language pronouns. On this account, which I call 'demonstrativism', pronouns are semantically equivalent to demonstratives. I begin by presenting some contrasts that provide support for demonstrativism. Then I try to explain these contrasts by developing a particular demonstrativist proposal. I build on the "hidden argument" theory of demonstratives (King, 2001, 2008; Elbourne, 2008; Hawthorne & Manley, 2012; Nowak, 2019; Blumberg, 2020). On this theory, demonstratives are semantically similar to definite descriptions, with one important difference: demonstratives take two arguments, rather than one. Using these ideas, I propose that pronouns also take two (covert) arguments, and that the second argument needs to be sufficiently salient to members of the conversation in order for the use of a pronoun to be felicitous. As for the first argument, I maintain that its content is constrained by the process of noun-phrase deletion (Elbourne, 2005). Taken together, I argue that these constraints provide us with a satisfying account of the uses to which pronouns are put.
Format: [ pdf ]
Reference: lingbuzz/006187
(please use that when you cite this article)
Published in: Philosophers' Imprint
keywords: anaphora, definite descriptions, demonstratives, semantics
Downloaded:70 times


[ edit this article | back to article list ]