Insights about cyclic syntax from cross-clausal scrambling and subject case in Balkar
Tanya Bondarenko, Colin Davis
July 2023 

(Published in Syntax as "Cross-Clausal Scrambling and Subject Case In Balkar: On Multiple Specifiers and the Locality of Overt and Covert Movement". https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/synt.12286) We use fieldwork data about cross-clausal scrambling in Balkar (Turkic) to clarify the nature of movement and its constraints. Balkar has a variety of embedded nominalized clauses, with different subject cases and possibilities for movement. Clauses with nominative subjects permit cross-clausal object extraction but not subject extraction. In contrast, clauses with accusative subjects permit both such movements, though movement of the subject is required for object extraction. Finally, clauses with genitive subjects permit only subject extraction. We argue that these facts provide evidence for the following proposals: 1. multiple specifiers are usually possible provided that tucking-in applies, 2. the highest of a phase’s multiple specifiers is privileged for accessibility, 3. movement is constrained by anti-locality (a ban on short movements), and 4. Balkar DPs do not permit multiple specifiers. These factors are intertwined informatively in Balkar, and are supported by additional facts about possessors, binding, and covert movement.

Format:	[ pdf ]
Reference:	lingbuzz/006214 (please use that when you cite this article)
Published in:	Published in Syntax, 2024
keywords:	scrambling, phases, multiple specifiers, case, (anti-)locality, balkar, syntax
previous versions:	v3 [January 2023] v2 [October 2022] v1 [September 2021]
Downloaded:	1139 times

 

[ edit this article | back to article list ]