Addressing the widest answerable question: English “just” as a domain widening strategy
Ashwini Deo, William Carl Thomas
September 2024 

This paper offers a unified account of the English particle "just" that covers its exclusive, emphatic/intensifying, precisifying, unexplanatory, unelaborative, and counter-expectational uses. Drawing on an insight from another semantic domain, we claim that the chameleon-like behavior of "just" can be made sense of if we treat it as having a domain-widening function. The key proposal is as follows: the use of "just" indicates that the speaker is considering the widest set of alternative answers relevant at the context. The analysis relies on the notion of the optimal construal of an underspecified question, which makes use of a comparison between the inquisitivity of questions, modeled as the width of a question. The optimal construal of a question further depends on its answerability – i.e. whether the speaker considers a true answer to be accessible at the context (satisfying Quality) and whether the speaker considers addressing it to be relevant to discourse goals (satisfying Relevance). The diverse contextual effects of "just" that are observed arise from the interaction between the way in which the set of alternative answers to the underspecified question is construed and what is taken to be the speaker’s motivation for signaling that the widest answerable construal of the question is being addressed via the prejacent.

Format:	[ pdf ]
Reference:	lingbuzz/008412 (please use that when you cite this article)
Published in:	To appear in Journal of Semantics (prepublication version)
keywords:	discourse dynamics, current question, exclusives, miratives, precisifiers, intensifiers
previous versions:	v2 [September 2024] v1 [September 2024]
Downloaded:	700 times

 

[ edit this article | back to article list ]